MANILA — On Tuesday, Sen. Francis “Kiko” Pangilinan called on the Senate leadership to conduct hearings on fresh bills targeting political dynasties right now, blaming them for poverty.

Pangilinan noted that one of the top concerns of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s administration was the anti-political dynasty law.

In addition to Pangilinan, Senators Bam Aquino, JV Ejercito, Risa Hontiveros, Panfilo Lacson, and Robinhood Padilla have also submitted anti-dynasty legislation.

Political dynasties are prohibited by the constitution, but Congress has not passed the necessary legislation.

Amid the multibillion-peso corruption scandal involving infrastructure contracts, the measure got renewed attention.

Several versions of anti-dynasty bills have been filed in Congress over the years, but none have successfully passed into law due to strong opposition, often from legislators who come from entrenched political families themselves.

Pangilinan stressed that holding hearings would allow lawmakers to examine the detrimental effects of dynastic politics, gather expert testimonies, and engage with grassroots groups advocating for political reforms.

Public sentiment largely favors anti-dynasty measures, as many Filipinos see political dynasties as perpetuating corruption and impeding social progress. Advocacy groups have urged the Senate to prioritize this issue, citing it as a key reform to strengthen democratic institutions.

However, the political reality remains complex. Critics argue that defining and regulating political dynasties can be legally and practically challenging, with concerns over infringing on political freedoms.

Senate Majority Leader Joel Villanueva expressed willingness to consider scheduling hearings but noted the need for a “thorough and fair discussion” to address all stakeholders’ concerns.

Pangilinan remains hopeful that the Senate will act promptly, urging colleagues to “rise above personal interests” and prioritize the Filipino people’s welfare.

The 1987 Philippine Constitution explicitly mandates the State to prohibit political dynasties “as may be defined by law.” However, no enabling law currently exists, leaving a significant gap in addressing dynastic politics.